About The Novel

In medieval times, the Kings and Queens maintained their inordinate wealth and power by claiming divine right.  God was the source of their standing. God was willing them to rule. God  chose them to be King. This fallacy worked pretty well as a means of  placating and pacifying the poor serfs who lived in mud huts eating  porridge. Especially since the fear of god was simultaneously instilled  in the people by the Catholic Church. It was a devastating one-two punch  of control. Today, the divine right narrative has lost all of it’s  punch.

In today’s world the same dichotomy exists in regard to the inequality of people. In fact, it’s much worse than it’s ever been:

Global inequality may be much worse than we think

In the United States, inequality is also at an all time high:

U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

Not just in terms of wealth, but in terms of access and actual power:

The costs of inequality: Increasingly, it’s the rich and the rest

So  the new kings and queens have to maintain this inequality using  something other than divine right. And they do this in a number of ways:

(1) By monetarily controlling the government.  The government in the United States is essentially a whore farm, with  the real owners standing in the back room behind a two way mirror. They  watch the farm and make sure the whores keep enacting those polices and  laws which benefit the creation and maintenance of their wealth. To  solidify this control, they make sure the legislature is stocked with  favor-owing whores in the own right. The legislative whores make sure  the whores at the farm whores can be bought:

Citizens United Has Been A Disaster For The Country

They  also make sure the whores can keep their jobs for life. Once you get a  good whore, you certainly don’t want to have to find a new one:

Sorry, Donald Trump. Term limits for Congress are (probably) never, ever going to happen.

They also make sure they buy both parties, to ensure the people’s “representative” is going to be their whore no matter what:

Romney and Obama Share Same Bankster Campaign Contributors

(2) By controlling the media.  The best way to make sure the masses are swayed to the position that  best suits the new kings and queens, is to own and control he media. And  keep the narrative on those issues which either creates inaction or  division (and this is one cause of this “divisive politics” you speak of).

These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

So,  it’s no surprise that Amazon’s Jeff Bezos would buy the Washington  Post. Nor that the WP would be a 24/7 mouthpiece for his globalist  agenda and the status quo:

Opinion | The U.S. trade deficit is a good thing. Really.

(3) By intentionally creating two sides of the same coin; each alleged to be polar opposite of the other.  But which, in reality, are really one giant mechanism of control. This  is our alleged two-party system. It would surprise some people that  Obama’s agenda and polices looked a lot like Bush’s agenda and policies.  Here is just one example of many:

Top 10 Bush Terror Policies Continued by Obama | Human Events

Is Obama Following In Bush's Footsteps?

(4) By using the media to divide us along emotional issues.  By keeping the narrative focused on emotional issues and not the real  issues that would help us fight the consolidation of wealth and power.

(5) By selling an agenda as if it’s good for the people;  when in fact it just fuels the agenda of the kings and queens. There  are many examples in this category. The two that stand out to me are (i)  Trickle Down Economic and (ii) The Bush Tax Cuts.

(6) By enacting a policy or law by alleging a feigned fight and some compromise.  This is my favorite tactic. Especially when they couple the ruse to  something that must be done! This is where some of that “political  divisiveness” originates. Using the Bush Tax Cuts, which were extended  repeatedly, here’s a great time chronology example of how it works:

Obama Is Against a Compromise on Bush Tax Cuts (9/7/2010)
Obama Hints At Procedural Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts, Says GOP's Holding 'Middle Class Hostage' (9/10/2010)
No Compromise from Obama on Bush Tax Cuts, Except Dividends - Progressive Policy Institute (9/21/2010)
Barack Obama gives way to Republicans over Bush tax cuts (12/6/2010)
Obama and G.O.P. Agree on Tax Cuts (12/6/2010)
Why Barack Obama Compromised On Tax Cuts | TIME.com (12/6/2010)
Obama signs bill to extend Bush-era tax cuts for two more years (12/17/2010)
President Obama Calls For One More Year Of Bush Tax Cuts, With Conditions: “Let’s Compromise” (7/9/2012)
A possible compromise on the Bush tax cuts (11/9/2012)
Obama tells labor he's committed to 'protecting' middle class on taxes (11/13/2012)
Obama says he will not extend Bush-era tax rate 'for folks who don't need it' (11/14/2013)
Budget Deal Makes Permanent 82 Percent of President Bush’s Tax Cuts (1/3/2013)
The Bush tax cuts are here to stay (1/7/2013)

I am currently working on a novel which will explore these issues in detail. If this is of any interest to you, please help support this project.