The threat of violence from Muslims when you criticize Islam is very tangibly real, but many seem to have the instinctive reaction although the threats of violence are real, it is an act of cowardice to give into such threats. The response when Sarkeesian and Quinn were at the UN seemed to be markedly different. There seemed to be no real concern that they were effectively asking for worldwide
censorship of their critics. Similarly there seemed to be no real concern that they were asking that people who they said were 'harassers' should be presumed guilty.
This latter act is incredible as it's basically an inversion of almost every first world justice system.
I sincerely hope that Google will not implement their requests for censorship.
If they do, you can be all but guaranteed that my channel will be first blood.
I sincerely hope that it doesn't end this way......surviving being a vocally opponent to Islamic censorship and real threats of violence, only to be cut down by a professional victim feminist claiming that even the most modest criticism is actually harassment that is as harmful to women as physical assault.
" The report also argues that “cyber touch is recognized as equally as harmful as physical touch,” suggesting that online harassment might be just as lethal as domestic violence or sexual abuse."
Time will tell.
Many thanks for your support!