Genre Is Small - inspired by the Star Wars Greeks of Travis Durden
Some art that made me say, "cool!" and a few tweets led to some bigger thoughts on genre writing - which is a pretty normal thing, small ideas leading to larger ones, if you've done some writing or pretty much any art I can think of or serious thinking.

I found Travis Durden's Star Wars Greek statuary through a tweet a couple of hours ago. Neat stuff.

I'm including the text of the tweets as the tweets do not seem to imbed here, at least in my view of the preview & actual post. If they do imbed, sorry about the repetition.

[Text of the tweet: Ancient greek statues sculpted as star wars characters by Travis Durden [links]]


Which lead to this tweet:

https://twitter.com/Tao23/status/725529116066217984

[Text: If these are dug up by 6016's archaeologists...

...they're going to be very confused.]


And this one:

https://twitter.com/Tao23/status/725529660658851840

[Text: And that begs the idea that ancient Egyptian Star Wars had a character with an ibis head, one with a jackal's...]


And finally this one:

https://twitter.com/Tao23/status/725530256635875328

[Text: Science fiction, fantasy, horror, magical realism, mythology, religion, legend... not much differentiating those.]


After I graduated from kiddie books so many years ago, I cut my reading teeth on science fiction. I tried reading the paperbacks my father brought home from used bookstores and quickly learned to look for the short story collections and anthologies -- I'd recently learned to read, it was hard enough to work through all the words I didn't recognize without trying to figure out what was going on in a whole novel. But the shorter short stories, in those early years, I could wrap my mind around those. And remember (well, you might not have known, so I'm telling you) this was in the mid-70s, when certainly many authors in science fiction and elsewhere may have been experimental in their writing, but the mainstream in short science fiction stories was heavy with straightforward plots, traditional story arcs, and mysteries resolved with a single final twist. There's plenty of that now, to be sure. But either there was more then or those are what I remember because they're the stories I understood as a child.


That's a long way to go to say that science fiction seemed huge to me, but it did. It seemed huge and very distinct because it was my entire fictional world then. Nursery rhymes and the little stories found in early reader books -- if you've had or been around small children just learning to read much, you'll recall them -- hardly counted.


And science fiction is distinct, or at least distinctive. The definition has been endlessly debated over, but most of us who read much of it recognize it when we see it. The same goes for the other genres I mentioned in that last tweet. Horror is distinct enough that we notice the difference, for example, when we read a Stephen King horror story as opposed to a Stephen King something else. Legends have a pretty distinct definition. Magical realism blurs the lines -- sometimes it's fantasy, sometimes it's science ficiton, sometimes it's literary, sometimes, sometimes, sometimes. 


That's the genre that really makes the point, with its blurryness.


They're all blurry, really. Think of Star Wars: get a SW fan who calls it science fiction and a SW fan who calls it science fantasy in the same room and watch the genre boundary argument fur fly.


We love to dicker over what story counts as which genre and who's that writer whose work is called X but really it's more Y don't you think?


To say they're all fiction is too simplistic. But there's that in pointing out that genres are small things that cannot really contain a story, not the large and well-defined things we're tempted to think of them as, that we often reflexively think of them as after a scholastic lifetime of being taught the boundaries of genre.


They're all stories. They're all about human beings and what human beings do and think and feel and wonder. All of them, even the genres where there is debate as to whether or not they're fiction or nonfiction: mythology, legend, religion.


They're stronger when they wander, stories are. When we get it into our minds that we can't write in X event because we're writing science fiction or that Y character doesn't make sense because we're reading fantasy, we weaken the stories that we might otherwise love, whether we're reading them, writing them, or representing them in other forms of art. For centuries fiction and poetry have derived inspiration and imagery from religion and mythology and legend (assuming you divide stories that faith has grown up around into those rather than lumping them together). Star Wars is beloved science fiction in part because it incorporates elements of fantasy and legend and even, at least in the beginning, of the Western movie.


Try picking out a few of your favorite stories that have won wide acclaim or are considered enduring classics. Give them a read with this in mind, and look for where the genres blur. You don't need a story that glaringly throws seventeen genres together; one that's mostly in one but draws in bits of others is just fine -- even better, in fact.


Much like the ancient advice that a single stick alone is weak but a bundle of those same sticks is strong together, I think you'll find that stories that gather together elements of different genres are the strongest.


And I also think that it's more than worth the effort to seek them out as a reader, and to try to create them as a writer.


[This post will appear on Seriously Eclectic sabarton.com on May 1st. Enjoy seeing it first -- and thanks once again for your support!] 


[This post was patron-exclusive until May 2nd.]