Last Wednesday (March 16), President Obama nominated
Merrick Garland to serve on the Supreme Court. Garland, the 63-year-old chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, is widely considered a moderate. But after the announcement, Senate Republican leaders reiterated their stance that they did not intend to consider the nomination because it is an election year. Democrats, meanwhile, repeated their charge that Republicans have a “constitutional duty” to at least hold hearings and a vote on a nominee.
Let’s tackle this issue. Does the Senate have a constitutional responsibility to consider a Supreme Court nomination?
This is The Weekly Column for March 22, 2016. Head over to OPaM to read the entire article, and a make sure to voice your opinion my making a comment in the comment section. Read the full article here: http://bit.ly/1Ui8ktd
If you haven’t already, you really need to sign up for our newsletter The Newsvine and follow Of Politics and Men on Twitter – be the first to know when new articles are published to OPaM.