No justification for routine neonatal circumcision, part 2, unmerited social support
Male circumcision isn't comparable to female circumcision and shouldn't be treated as the same kind of violation of the individual. In my last post, I looked at fallacious medical arguments in favor of routine neonatal circumcision. Careful examination of the facts and application of logic to the available information led to the conclusion that there is no medical excuse for the practice.
Paid for by patrons
More circumcision arguments addressed
This is the second of two articles on this topic. The first addressed fallacious medical support for the procedure. The point of these two articles was, in large part, providing a reference material for people to use in dealing with the goalpost-moving, dodge-and-weave debate style of advocates for routine neonatal circumcision by addressing the various arguments they use, making it that much harder to use topic switching to dodge rational counterarguments.