Logan Wogoman
About
Location
Following7 Creators
December 2, 2014 04:09:56
December 22, 2014 22:28:39
Rumle Kjaer Amazing video!
February 7, 2015 00:46:44 · Reply
MCplayer94 <3 Love it! Damn!
March 29, 2015 01:23:20 · Reply
December 27, 2014 17:45:33
Allayna Groove wow, spam emails are not awesome
December 28, 2014 06:01:13 · Reply
Sally Haylock Smarter Every Day with Destin & Family <3 Awesome!!
January 3, 2015 20:37:41 · Reply
Vincent Jackson Clever
January 18, 2015 14:15:18 · Reply
January 9, 2015 18:16:01
Nav Ahh. A nice hard-hitting, guitar-driven rocker! Love the contrast between the 5/4 and 4/4 sections, and the trippy glockenspiel vs. distorted guitar. You used these to great musical effect to represent the "collision" of two different worlds. Nice, bro. Cool visual effects with the lighting. Especially the dust particles circling the light around your breath when up on the mic. Finally, nice Bellamy-esque guitar solo. I think it could be brought out of the mix even more to help the song reach its full-on sonic peak at 3:20. Fine artistry all around. You're improving on all fronts.
January 12, 2015 21:04:15 · Reply
Basement Alchemy Spot on analyze Nav, the depth you reach when listening to a song is truly remarkable and appreciated! Thank you.
January 13, 2015 19:08:28 · Reply
January 20, 2015 19:52:16
Smarter Every Day Whoa! You quit facebook!
February 7, 2015 19:48:56 · Reply
Kristy Well, I ended up having to go back to see power soccer team updates. They won't use email! But a word of caution to all: I had the experience of seeing the scope of my photos that FB has uploaded when I made my "Year in Review" video. I wanted a specific pic, and did not see it. At the time, there was a "Customize" button at the bottom of the template, so I hit it. And then I went to "Access All Photos".. and my jaw hit the floor. FB had photos of my missions in Iraq -- ALL of them, not the select few I had chosen to put in an album. They had gory photos of blown-off limbs, genitalia, guts -- and showing the faces of everyone. Military mission photos, not redacted, that I took in 2004 on a long-gone digital camera, uploaded to a long-dead iMac. When I made that album (in 2007, in Italy), FB had grabbed every photo on my computer. I know this because I have since lost the CD of photos, and the computer was gone. I took a couple of screenshots for proof, but it was very disturbing. The wording of FB's "privacy" (ha!) statement allows FB to access all photos on your device (computer or camera) when you upload. Be careful. Put everything you value and want to protect on your portable hard drive, disconnect, THEN upload what you want. Because otherwise, you've given them the keys to your house.
February 8, 2015 03:25:55 · Reply
ChristianBitterlich Hi Destin, did you know that the Bauer Media Group is one of the initiators and enforcing promotors of the German law called "Leistungsschutzrecht" (ancillary copright), which they created against googles news snipets, but enforcing them also on blogger. However facebook is not there only harvesting ground ( http://www.schoen-und-fein.de/dreister-bilderklau/ ), recycling content without correct linking, asking or even paying is common sence of the Bauer Media Group. Talking to them seems to be a waste of time while they can collect more money on the side adds (10428 EUR for 1/3 A4-page paper add with a volume of 150k) or your example with linked visitors for facebook. The only efficient way is to claim an interim injunction combined with a restrictive covenant/cease and desist agreement. Claiming a portion of the "add-money" or value of the used content is at least in Germany a very long way (up to 3 years) before the court sets a positive verdict for the content robbet prosecutor. It's a bit funny that the motion picture industry is enforcing closing of websites, which are just linking content and facebook, which has listed in there terms and conditions "that you are not allowed to upload content, where you are not the legal owner" still allows the firm to post new or the same content again. At least youtube has a counter, where the poster will be banned after a certain amount of content fraud.
February 7, 2015 11:38:51 · Reply
January 21, 2015 18:26:00
Raffael Viotti I love it !! Awesome job !! (It's funny, cause I also did a mashup with Chameleon but with "chicken").. Can't wait to have a video tutorial on that ;) When are you touring in Europe (Switzerland ?) :)
February 3, 2015 16:13:31 · Reply
Edward D Saslaw excellent. but how do I get the Mp3
February 7, 2015 01:48:55 · Reply
February 19, 2015 14:41:40
Bob Conner This is gonna be an awesome trip Destin; glad to be here to enjoy it
February 27, 2015 00:50:58 · Reply
Bob Conner So Destin. When are we going to see your SED video from the IST???? You waiting to be among the first to ride up there in the Orion?
March 16, 2015 02:17:16 · Reply
Bob Conner Make that the ISS, not IST :-)
March 16, 2015 02:19:36 · Reply
February 22, 2015 18:42:20
February 26, 2015 19:44:25
sara fosdick What can we do for you two besides be Patrons. This last video shows yer creative juices flowing faster and faster. It had to have been way long hours. Besides 'grapefruit groupies'---how else can we support you ? Will the coming spree cast deal with that ?
February 27, 2015 23:28:33 · Reply
Jamie Chandley You guys are so frikkin' cool. (Yes, I suppose I could could be called a shameless Pompla-phant). Seriously. I'm running out of ways to tell you how awesome I think the two of you are. This version of Uptown Funk is by far my fave. In fact, I've enjoyed ya'll's version of every cover more than the original. (And your original pieces practically make me swoon. Jack, that keyboard riff in "Come Out To Play" makes my heart soar and gives me goosebumps EVERYtime I hear it). (too much? too many parentheses? LOL). Your art makes me laugh and dance and generally brings joy to my heart. PomplaJack and PomplaNataly are at the top of the list of my favorite humans on this planet. I am so privileged to be able to contribute in some minute, infinitesimal way to support your talent. Meeting you two in Asheville was so fantastic...I'm looking forward to your next tour. Any ideas on when you might hit the road again and if you do, might you come down South to entertain us once more? Hugs, love and fist bumps to ya'll.
March 1, 2015 22:19:57 · Reply
Mike Chorak It's been really interesting seeing the production quality of your videos skyrocket since 5 years ago since I started watching your videos. So glad you guys are still rockin' it. Also, I saw your Chicago show and you guys were amazing live! Can't wait for your next tour.
March 2, 2015 03:58:07 · Reply
March 1, 2015 11:33:58
March 15, 2015 18:40:23
March 24, 2015 13:35:38
Jeff Dzado Wait...I thought the closer you are to the planet, the faster you had to move to keep missing it. You're saying the velocity of the Soyuz is SLOWER than the velocity of the ISS? I fully understand that the Soyuz is orbiting Earth more quickly and 'catching up' to the ISS.
March 24, 2015 17:45:46 · Reply
Paul Spooner Awesome video! Just one problem though. At 7:34, the visual annotations mention that Soyuz is moving slower, but orbiting faster. But in actuality, the Soyuz is both moving and orbiting faster, and the ISS is both moving and orbiting slower. Then at 9:02 you make the same mistake, only in the voice-over.
March 24, 2015 17:50:49 · Reply
Trevor Madge I think he said it correctly... Soyuz is moving slower at about 17,000 miles per hour and the ISS is moving at about 17,500 m/h. But, because Soyuz is closer to the earth, the distance it needs to travel to go around once is smaller than that of the ISS, so it gets around it faster.... Soyuz is moving slower but orbiting faster.
March 24, 2015 19:54:34 · Reply
Paul Spooner Your numbers must be off. If both orbits are circular around the same body, then the smaller one will have the higher velocity.
March 24, 2015 19:57:06 · Reply
Trevor Madge If both are orbiting at the same speed (1 "lap" every 90 minutes) than the one with the larger orbit would be travelling faster because it needs to go farther. Just because they're orbiting the same body doesn't necessarily mean one is faster than the other. In this case, they said that Soyuz is travelling around 17,000 m/h and orbits in 86 minutes, and the IIS is travelling around 17,500 m/h and orbits in 90 minutes.
March 24, 2015 20:06:47 · Reply
Paul Spooner You have understand geometry correctly, but misunderstand orbital mechanics. Bodies simply can not orbit at whatever velocity they like.
March 24, 2015 20:08:35 · Reply
Trevor Madge You're probably right that my understanding of orbital mechanics is a little off. I decided to do a little reading and I've been looking at the equations here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_orbit If I understand them correctly, as the radius increases, velocity decreases and orbital period increases. That seems to explain why the ISS is taking longer to travel around the earth, but it doesn't explain why it's travelling faster. Maybe it has to do with the difference in mass between the Soyuz and the ISS? That's the only other variable in those equations. A larger mass would require a higher velocity.
March 25, 2015 14:59:09 · Reply
Nils R Grotnes Galileo disagrees...
April 20, 2015 22:04:44 · Reply
Evan Hagerty I would disagree with you Paul;what the Astronaut said made sense, although it was a bit confusingly put. One way to look at it through the simplified equation (V^2)/r=9.81m/s^2, which shows that as the radius of orbit increases, the linear velocity of the orbiter increases. Another perspective is that in order to increase the radius of circular orbit the ship must fire a rocket (twice) with the force of this acting in the same direction as the velocity of the ship. The first burn increases kinetic energy, then this is "traded" for gravitational potential energy as the rocket orbits to it's slowest, farthest out point, and then the kinetic energy is increased once again until the orbit is circular. The confusing part is that while increasing the radius of orbit leads to a higher linear velocity, it leads to a longer orbital period. Sorry if I've misunderstood your perspective on this. I found the video fascinating, and I can tell you did too, so cheers!
March 25, 2015 02:49:05 · Reply
April 1, 2015 00:59:10
Юлия Ковтун Святые Печеньки! Это первый женский вокал, который мне по настоящему понравился!
April 2, 2015 19:24:48 · Reply
PJ DiIorio Jack: I noticed in one shot while you were playing the Rhodes (~1:32) that your headphones are plugged into what looks like a phone in your pocket...what's up with that?
May 2, 2015 05:23:02 · Reply
Graci Phillips Are the lyrics posted somewhere for this song?
May 7, 2015 13:12:48 · Reply
April 1, 2015 06:51:34
Austin Burnham At the end my wife said, "Oh good they sleep on the right sides of the bed." (That means the same side of the bed that we sleep on) Another great video; you have a wonderful family.
April 2, 2015 03:52:49 · Reply
Sergio I Montserrat S While I do like babies, I didn't sign as patron here to watch them. So, I've not seen this vid. But what I see above bothers me: "NOTE: THE DOLLAR VALUE SHOWN ON THIS PATREON PAGE IS WRONG. THE ACTUAL DONATED MOUNT IS MUCH LOWER THAN THIS!" How are we supposed to consider this declaration as? What's its purpose? Of course, nobody would know for certain unless they were explained the charging process and the commissions that money passes through, diminishing from the grand total given in the left of this page. I do know roughly how much is taken from the money because a different creator used to sumarize his Patreon income in his blog. And the money that both the charging agency and the Patreon site take is not outrageous. Expressed my displeassure for your note, Justin, I'd now like to ask you: What is your purpose in writing that note? What is your intent?
April 5, 2015 05:57:24 · Reply
Jedidiah Francis Thanks for sharing Destin.
April 6, 2015 17:22:32 · Reply
April 25, 2015 02:05:28
Sally Haylock safe Travels,and Blessed Journeys
April 27, 2015 14:22:36 · Reply
Fox Sawyer i ride my biiiiicycle
April 27, 2015 15:56:46 · Reply
Charles Bradshaw I found one of these bikes in a theme park in New Zealand ...I found bang-bang control worked well(2/3 meters after a day's practice), but if i went too long without a switch my brain flipped to my regular bike linear controller. Results were ... humerous. Thanks for sharing !!!
May 4, 2015 08:18:53 · Reply
April 28, 2015 16:36:27
PJ DiIorio I can't wait for the producer pack on this one!
May 2, 2015 05:07:29 · Reply
Felicia Sloin I would like to see a part 2 for this drone. Perhaps he's pursuing the wrong object of his desire. Maybe he needs to find true love with Jack. I mean if a sentient drone can't find love, is there any hope for us poor humans?
May 6, 2015 13:51:15 · Reply
April 30, 2015 04:46:02
Nick Vahalik Really, really cool. This is a GREAT way of visualizing something that radio operators have to consider every day: VSWR (Voltage Standing Wave Ratio). With VSWR you're dealing with RF frequencies that are reflected back at a transmitter due to an impedance mismatch on an antenna at the end of a feed line. So instead of the power that should be going to your antenna that power (or some portion of it) comes right back at you, creating standing waves on the feed line like you see here in the video. Since AC power (really any frequency) can be shown as a vector, you can "do math" on them. In this scenario, you've got nulls in between two opposing vectors that are *in phase* and the peaks and valleys are added together and grow accordingly. In the radio world, you're dealing with kilo-volts being sent down a coax feed line and if you send down a kilovolt and let's say, 70% of that power is reflected back to you in-phase, those spikes can exceed the voltage rating of a cable. So instead of a drop of water exploding as in your video, this voltage spike can burn through your coax, cause fires, damage equipment, and otherwise ruin your day.
April 30, 2015 14:32:36 · Reply
Dr. Richard Beekman ENJOYED IT. KEEP UP GREAT WORK!
May 1, 2015 01:58:17 · Reply
Weatherlawyer I have a difficult one for you I can't prove this is not just coincidence but when a weather system steps off the Eastern coast of North America A significant earthquake occurs in the Aleutians. This has a reciprocal that before a weather system arises a seiche is initiated in the ocean in which the next tropical storm will occur. The epicentre will be in the region where the storm peaks and lie on the storm track. As proof of this two or three related earthquakes always occur with the demise and a blocking Low will contain two or three parallel fronts. I only know for sure they occur with the North Atlantic but am pretty sure they do the same with the North Pacific. Could you twist the arm of some seismologist to see if they can follow this idea with whatever is required.
June 1, 2015 12:03:21 · Reply
May 8, 2015 21:59:25
Travis This video is Awesome! Started watching a couple of weeks ago after I saw the Backwards bike video. These 2 videos have me hooked and I really just want to say thanks for everything you do. I would also like to agree with Levi on everything he said. First time I got chill like that in awhile. Thanks
May 14, 2015 20:00:11 · Reply
Weatherlawyer Your man needs to take lessons in communication techniques.
June 1, 2015 18:35:36 · Reply
May 25, 2015 20:00:08
Judy Gibson Great, Niko and Sam -- I have to get my LA grandsons over there to see you when we can coordinate with a visit from your Mom. Love, Aunt Judy
May 26, 2015 01:37:53 · Reply
yousefesam Where can i find the paper cuts tutorial?
June 22, 2015 09:11:52 · Reply
May 28, 2015 18:52:13
Geoffrey Lee That is incredible. Gives me so much more respect for archers.
May 28, 2015 21:32:48 · Reply
A. Ron Carmichael This is MOSTLY correct. The failure to consider the lateral sliding of the bowstring OFF OF THE FINGERS, which determines which way the arrow is going to flex, and which way the back end of the arrow is going to MOVE, actually altering the initial trajectory (direction of travel) of the point of the arrow, is EVERYTHING about determining whether archer's paradox exists or not. With the compound bow demonstrated, the archer uses a mechanical release that completely ELIMINATES the lateral slide, thus at no point in the arrow release is the arrow aimed OFF of the target as it is when an archer is holding the string with fingers. The paradox is not that the arrow does not "hit" the riser, the paradox is that the arrow IS NEVER POINTED AT THE TARGET BY THE ARCHER WHEN AIMING through a sight. As far as "being smart enough to know which way the nodes are flexing so you can hit the aspirin, just move the archer back 4 feet, changing the distance so he (one of the world's most distinguished and excellent demonstration archers) has to completely readjust his aim. He can do it but it will take him some shots to home back in. THAT IS THE PARADOX: NOT THAT THE ARROW DOESN'T HIT THE RISER/BOW, BUT THAT THE ARROW SHOT IS STARTED OUT AIMED COMPLETELY TO THE SIDE OF THE TARGET, YET STRING SIDESLIP (from the fingertips) CAUSES IT TO BE POINTED DURING A FEW MILLISECONDS DIRECTLY AT THE TARGET. THAT is the paradox. That the shaft flexes in nodal behavior so that the nock and vanes avoid hitting the bow (which his large feathers do NOT do) is a function of TUNING, selecting the right spine as it relates to the archer's release technique, the weight of the bow, the point weight, even the nature of the limbs of the bow and the surface of the archer's finger tab.
May 30, 2015 02:38:23 · Reply
Smarter Every Day At 2:45 Byron says "The first thing that happens is the arrow bends from the pressure of the string". He shows a lateral motion while explaining this.
June 1, 2015 03:42:04 · Reply
A. Ron Carmichael oops, sorry - I just noticed, I am citation (9) in the wiki references he posted, which refers to something I first posted on a website I maintain, in 2001. http://www.texasarchery.org for more info (and hundreds of photo examples of archers' releases). Highspeed video examples on the TSAA facebook page as well, I think... 600fps and 1200fps examples. Ron
May 30, 2015 02:50:32 · Reply
May 28, 2015 17:12:44
Scott Takahashi love the ethereal piano plinks :)
June 9, 2015 22:32:59 · Reply
Pomplamoose SCOTT! YES.
June 11, 2015 21:28:59 · Reply
Carlos Cabrera This is awesome!
June 10, 2015 22:55:11 · Reply
Pomplamoose Why thank you, Carlos!! HOORAY!
June 11, 2015 21:28:47 · Reply
John Urschel Personally, I thought it could use a barking dog drum solo. No offense Jack! Otherwise, superb as always.
June 22, 2015 21:35:10 · Reply
Carlos Cabrera Ha! Thanks John!!!
June 23, 2015 03:52:03 · Reply
July 1, 2015 06:59:00
August 1, 2015 06:59:00
September 1, 2015 06:59:00
October 1, 2015 06:59:00
Ryan "Dave" Davis You and your wife are adorable. I smiled the whole time! Good luck with your new baby!
December 3, 2014 02:27:44 · Reply
Ben Fuchs Is there a chance you would do your vids without the "sponsored by" ads for us patreon people? I usually like your videos and then there is this moment where you start making ads and my approval goes down. I really avoid ads wherever I can because I think they suck so much. Gimme a chance to watch your stuff without that yucky feeling.
December 4, 2014 17:18:23 · Reply
Smarter Every Day Ben, If there were a lot more Patrons, sponsorship wouldn't even be considered! I get what you're saying man. I feel the same way. Audible is a lot more tolerable of a product because it makes us Smarter. Destin
December 5, 2014 04:10:39 · Reply